科研质量评价：一个基于影响力的多层次量化模型及
其实例
| 作 者：涂阳军 王娟娟 徐上 |
| 单 位：湖南大学 |
| 基金项目： |
| 摘 要： |
| 科研影响力是科研质量评价中最重要的核心指标之一。
围绕科研影响力这一核心指标，研究首先分析了科研影响力的
四个层次，包括研究者及其所代表的学术团体、期刊人员及其
所代表的学术团体、学术共同体研究者、社会大众和政府等广
泛的利益相关群体，进而建构了一个以科研影响力为核心的多
层次量化评价模型。基于此理论模型，研究以2017～2018年版
CSSCI收录的50本教育学期刊论文被引数为分析对象，给出了
如何对科研影响力进行评价的实例，结果表明该模型使用极
为便利，能够用于对研究者、学术团体及科研机构的科研质量
进行评价。 |
| 关键词：科研质量；科研影响力；量化模型；论文被引数；
CSSCI教育学 |
Evaluation of Scientific Research Quality: An Multi-level
Quantitative Model Based on Research Impact and Its
Example
| Author's Name: TU Yang-jun WANG Juan-juan Xu Shang |
| Institution: |
| Abstract: |
| Abstract: Research influence is one of the most important indicators on the domain of research quality evaluation.
The UK Scientific Research Council defines the influence of scientific research as the outstanding contribution made
by outstanding research to society and economy, and then divides the influence of scientific research into academic
influence and socio-economic influence. In fact, based on different subjects, research influence can be divided into
many different levels, among which the most important ones are the academic community and the public. In addition,
the entire process of forming academic results can be divided into the influence on the researcher and the academic
group they represent, and on the journal staff and the academic groups they represent.
This paper focuses on the core concepts of the impact about academic papers, and analyzes this concept from the
four levels: First, the influence on researchers and the academic groups; Second, journal personnel and their represents
the influence of academic groups; Third, the influence of scholars on academic communities; Fourth, the influence of
social and government stakeholders.
Sufficient to research the influence of the four levels of interpretation, the researchers concluded and reflected
on the four levels of theory and practice of around the core concepts in the influence of scientific research, to
construct a quantitative model based on the influence of the multi-level from firstly the formation of scientific
research achievements, contributions, review, until finally been major database included, secondly by the academic
community and stakeholder groups on the process of reference, and to read or review scientific research achievements
in the process of the individual, thirdly for the object represented by the academic society. Finally, put forward the
following formula: Y(influence of scientific research) = W1×X1+W2×X2+W3×X3+W4×X4 (X1, X2, X3, X4 number
respectively, cited number, download count and adopted, W1, W2, W3, W4, respectively the weight of article number,
cited several numbers, download).
Based on this model and using an amount of 50 CSSCI pedagogical journals. Through the collection, collation
and analysis of the 2017 data of these journals, the research quality of pedagogic disciplines in China’s research
institutes was explored. Higher education quality evaluation is discussed in a case study in how to quantitative evaluate
the quality of the scientific research, and from the angle of scientific quality report based on the scientific research
the influence of the evaluation result, finally demonstrated that this “multi-level quantitative model” in the theoretical
level of the maneuverability of the innovative and practical level, not only can be used to evaluate the quality of the
individual research, can also be used in the process of assessing academic groups and research institutes of scientific
research. |
| Keywords: scientific research quality; academic influence; quantitative model; citations; CSSCI pedagogy |
| 投稿时间：2018-02-15 |
|
|
|
查看pdf文件
|
|
